Thanks for all the excellent comments on my previous post. Phil-gate has started a lot of wonderful conversations all over the Internet and in other places. (You may recall an old-time method of communication where two or more people actually sit in the same room and TALK TO EACH OTHER. That’s happening too.) As I said yesterday, this isn’t about Phil Robertson and it’s not about A & E. It’s about public discussion of religious issues. Some commenters here and elsewhere have cried “foul” wondering why A & E isn’t protected by the same free speech rights as Phil Robertson. They most definitely are. The cable cops have not shown up at their headquarters with a warrant for anyone’s arrest. Yes indeed, they are perfectly within their rights to suspend or even terminate Phil for violating their company policy. But here’s the thing, you and I have a right to demand that our media sources uphold a certain standard. Obviously for millions of us that standard includes allowing their employees to express their religious views. If the network wants our business then they should give us what we want. If they don’t want our business, that’s ok too. There are a lot of other channels. It’s worth mentioning that an A & E representative was present at the GQ interview. As part of the ABC/Disney conglomerate, the network definitely could have applied pressure on the magazine to filter Phil’s comments. They did not. Hmmmmm. I would like to comment on a comment made by Chaz Peters on my earlier post.
Loved this article. On a side note you mentioned that Robertson’s stance on homosexuality is in alignment with the Catholic Church. Sadly, according to statements from the newest Pope and the conclusions of the Third Vatican Council, the catholic church has changed its official position on that matter. In fact they appear to declare that God has changed His opinion as well. It might be nice if you wrote on this matter as I see it as of far greater concern world-wide than the Duck Dynasty controversy.
This is a misunderstanding perpetrated by the same media that are saying Phil is a racist and a homophobe. The Pope has actually said nothing of the kind. What he has said corresponds to the ancient teaching going all the way back to Christ. “Hate the sin. Love the sinner.” Being homosexual is not a sin. Performing homosexual acts is. We, as Christians, are not called to judge others even though most of us do it and even think we’re very good at it. Logically then homosexual men and women are called to be celibate. Of course our “modern” society laughs at such an old-fashioned notion. Doesn’t it say in the Bible, or the US Constitution, or the Magna Carta, or somewhere that we all have the right to sexual satisfaction? Sorry but no. In fact, Scripture tells us that a celibate life is the most excellent life of all. But why would we expect society to believe that when they either don’t believe anything in the Bible or choose to believe just the parts that suit them? No, Church teaching hasn’t changed. God’s opinion hasn’t changed. And, unfortunately, the media’s ability to twist and spin a public figure’s words to fit their story hasn’t changed either.
The media are counting on us to forget this story in a short time. They hope that Christmas and New Years and other news stories will push Phil-gate out of our consciousness. Please don’t let that happen. Stay informed. Make your feelings known at every opportunity. I’ve been wondering for years what it would take for Christians to be fed up enough to take some action. Maybe the time is now.
- Thomas More Law Center: Duck Dynasty’s Phil Robertson’s View on Homosexuality Reflects the Catholic Church’s Teachings (saveamericafoundation.com)
- Phil Robertson, the straw that that broke the camels back? (robertsthoughts2.wordpress.com)
- ‘Duck’ censorship a warning to ministers? (mobile.wnd.com)
Filed under: Christmas, Church teaching, Current Events, faith, forgiveness, Life | Tagged: A & E, Bible, Catholic Church, Chick-fil-A, Cracker Barrel, Duck Dynasty, GQ, homosexuality, Phil Robertson, Phil-gate |